Medical-liability reform remains a top legislative priority for groups such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the myriad societies representing specialist physicians, lobbyists emphasized.

January 31st, 2007

Although physician lobbyists recognize that their years-long quest for a federal law capping medical-malpractice lawsuit awards is unlikely to be fulfilled by the Democratic Congress, they are taking the long view.

But the changing political reality has forced them to adjust their strategies not only in dealing with Congress, but also in responding to their members and clients.

Promoting an issue to an uninterested majority party in Congress while restless clients grow frustrated is a challenge for any lobbyist. One lobbyist for physician interests said doctors must be convinced that the lobby’s work in Washington is only one part of a broader strategy.

Doctors around the country, and their representatives in Washington, still clamor for help with rising malpractice insurance premiums they contend are driven by litigious trial lawyers and profligate juries.

President Bush shares this aim, arguing that high malpractice-insurance premiums are threatening some doctors’ abilities to stay in business, especially among specialty physicians such as obstetrician-gynecologists. “To protect good doctors from junk lawsuits, we need to pass medical-liability reform,” he said last week during his State of the Union address.

The president’s words were met by silence on the Democratic side of the House chamber. A political environment that was less than completely hospitable to tort reform when the Republicans controlled Congress turned practically hostile to the idea when Democrats seized control of the legislature

to read the full story, click here

Become one of the Thousands Who Have Now Discovered Insurance Company Secrets, even though they Never Thought They Could. We will pay for the shipping

Or, to learn more about What Everybody Should Know… About How To Discover Insurance Company Secrets-click here-


 

Food and Drug Administration officials unveiled a variety of initiatives Tuesday to improve drug safety and expand information to the public about the medicines they take.

January 31st, 2007

Food and Drug Administration officials unveiled a variety of initiatives Tuesday to improve drug safety and expand information to the public about the medicines they take.

Among the steps announced at a news conference:

•A collaboration with the Veterans Health Administration to share information and expertise related to the review and use of medical products.

•A pilot program to produce safety profiles of new drugs after they have been on the market for 18 months.

•Periodic newsletters on the FDA website to update consumers about post-marketing reviews of drugs.

•Establishment of a committee of outside experts to advise the FDA about how to communicate risks to the public.

•Organizational changes to improve communication between FDA staffers who review drugs before approval and those who track the drugs’ safety afterward.

The FDA’s efforts come in response to an Institute of Medicine report released last September. The report, which was requested by the FDA, concluded that the agency needs to pay more attention to the safety of drugs once they are on the market, a move that requires more money and regulatory authority. FDA commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach said the agency regards the report as “a substantial amount of advice,” not a “rigid blueprint.”

Become one of the Thousands Who Have Now Discovered Insurance Company Secrets, even though they Never Thought They Could. We will pay for the shipping

Or, to learn more about What Everybody Should Know… About How To Discover Insurance Company Secrets-click here-


 

Tallahassee — Medical malpractice companies benefitting from courtroom caps must tell state regulators today why they are not returning more of that money to doctors and the public.

January 31st, 2007

Tallahassee — Medical malpractice companies benefitting from courtroom caps must tell state regulators today why they are not returning more of that money to doctors and the public.

Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty has ordered executives of major malpractice insurers to attend public hearings today in Tallahassee on their rates.

Consumer Advocate Steve Burgess, in the Department of Financial Services, estimates premiums should be cut 40 percent to 50 percent.

The Insurance Companies have kept the money–when it should be saving consumers money. The Legislature three years ago capped pain and suffering awards to
$500,000 per physician and $1 million per case. Since then, Burgess
contends, insurance data shows medical malpractice legal costs and
payouts have dropped 43.6 percent, from $989 million to $557 million.

Or, to learn more about What Everybody Should Know… About How To Discover Insurance Company Secrets-click here-

Become one of the Thousands Who Have Now Discovered Insurance Company Secrets, even though they Never Thought They Could. We will pay for the shipping


 

Arizona Senate on Monday approved a medical malpractice bill to raise the bar on the legal burden of proof required for malpractice lawsuits involving emergency medical care.

January 31st, 2007

The Senate approved the bill 16-12, sending it to the House. Sixteen votes are the minimum needed for Senate passage.
Governor Napolitano vetoed an identical bill last year.
Republican Sen. Carolyn Allen of Scottsdale reintroduced the measure this year, a month after a Napolitano-appointed task force recommended adoption of the change.
The bill would raise the burden of proof for lawsuits over emergency care.
The existing lower standard requires a “preponderance of the evidence,” which essentially means something is more likely than not. The new standard would require “clear and convincing evidence.”
To give a comparison, the proposed new standard approaches that required in a criminal trial (beyond a resonable doubt)–the standard required to convict OJ Simpson, which proved unattainable. If the hospital kills or injures your loved one, do you want to have to prove wrongdoing at that standard, or should the standard that has applied for hundreds of year be enough?

 

Government alleges that Columbus, Ohio-based Roxane engaged in a scheme to report fraudulent and inflated prices for several pharmaceutical products, knowing that federal health care programs established reimbursement rates based on those reported prices.

January 30th, 2007

The United States has intervened in a whistleblower suit filed in the District of Massachusetts against Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane, Inc. and various related entities, alleging that Roxane violated the False Claims Act, the Justice Department announced today. In its complaint, the government alleges that Columbus, Ohio-based Roxane engaged in a scheme to report fraudulent and inflated prices for several pharmaceutical products, knowing that federal health care programs established reimbursement rates based on those reported prices.
The government’s complaint alleges that the Ohio pharmaceutical manufacturer, from at least on or before January 1, 1996, reported prices that, in some instances, were more than 1,000 percent the actual sales prices on certain of the drugs it manufactures. The United States alleges that Medicare and Medicaid have reimbursed Roxane’s customers in excess of $500 million for the drugs which are the subject of the complaint. Roxane sells generic drugs that are reimbursed by the two federal health care programs.
The difference between the inflated government reimbursement rates and the actual price paid by healthcare providers for a drug is referred to as the “spread.” The larger the spread on a drug, the larger the profit or return on investment for the provider. The government alleges that Roxane used artificially inflated spreads to market, promote and sell the drugs to existing and potential customers. Because reimbursement from federal programs was based on the fraudulent inflated prices, the United States contends that Roxane caused false and fraudulent claims to be submitted to federal healthcare programs.

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.
 


 

Patients whose health care policies had been retroactively canceled when they got sick, leaving them uninsured, uninsurable and hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt, will urge state regulators for tough new rules on health insurers at a public hearing in Los Angeles.

January 29th, 2007

California patients are at the mercy of HMOs and insurance companies that drop patients to boost their bottom line, putting profit far ahead of patient care. For example, Blue Cross of California, the health insurers against whom hundreds of patient complaints have been filed, paid $1.4 billion in shareholder dividends to its parent company since 2002.
The Department of Managed Health Care recently announced it will write new regulations to tighten scrutiny of the illegal practice in response to a petition by FTCR.
Read Los Angeles Times coverage: “Sick but Insured? Think Again,” available at: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/healthcare/nw/?postId=6833
Read more about illegal insurance cancellations at: http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/healthcare/StopCancellations/

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.
 


 

Disclosure and transparency are the cutting edge ways to address liability concerns, reduce medical errors, and improve the culture of health care institutions

January 27th, 2007

During Feb. 2003, the unthinkable happened at Duke University Hospitals: a patient received a heart and double lung transplant with organs of the incorrect blood type. Then, another unthinkable event happened: The Duke staff disclosed the error to the family. The transplant error and subsequent disclosure became national news.
The Duke disclosure story will be featured at a national conference on transparency and disclosure hosted in Las Vegas Mar. 19 and 20 by The Risk Management and Patient Safety Institute (RM&PSI).
“Disclosure has become an extremely hot topic today, and we want to share our disclosure experiences – both good and bad – with people. We are excited to be part of this conference to help educate healthcare, insurance, and legal professionals about transparency and disclosure,” said Douglas Borg, director of insurance for Duke University Health System.
“Disclosure is the right thing to do, but a lot of thought needs to be put into it. Thanks to the growing disclosure movement many organizations are beginning the process of developing disclosure programs, and that’s good for our patients. We hope telling our story through this conference can help these organizations,” added Borg.
TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.


 

A Lawrence, Massachusetts woman was charged in federal court with tampering with drugs at a Lawrence hospital and with making false statements to law enforcement officials.

January 26th, 2007

United States Attorney Michael J. Sullivan; Mark Dragonetti, Resident Agent in Charge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Criminal Investigations in New England; Joseph C. Moraski, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General for New England; and Paul J. Cote, Jr., Commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, announced today that DEBORAH STELLA, age 39, of Lawrence, Massachusetts, was charged in an indictment with one count of tampering with consumer products and two counts of making false statements.
The indictment alleges that STELLA was employed as a registered nurse at Lawrence General Hospital located in Lawrence, Massachusetts. The indictment alleges that STELLA tampered with three vials of the Schedule II narcotic, Morphine Sulfate Injection, by removing morphine sulfate from the vials and replacing the removed liquid with another solution. Morphine sulfate is used to manage pain in patients. The indictment further alleges that STELLA falsely stated to federal law enforcement officials that she had not taken any medications from Lawrence General Hospital, and that she falsely stated that she had not tampered with any drugs at Lawrence General Hospital

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.


 

Being Famous Does Not Protect A Patient From Poor Medical Care. Notre Dame football coach’s case goes to trial.

January 26th, 2007

Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis’ medical malpractice suit against two Boston doctors is scheduled to go to trial next month.Weis nearly died after undergoing gastric bypass surgery in June 2002, when he was the offensive coordinator for the New England Patriots. Weis had the operation to lose weight after battling chronic obesity for years.

Weis began bleeding internally soon after the operation and was in a coma for two weeks.

His lawsuit alleges that Massachusetts General Hospital physicians Charles Ferguson and Richard Hodin acted negligently. The doctors deny they did anything wrong.

for full blog post, click here

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.


 

In a recent study done by Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy organization, it was proven that fewer counties every year for more than a decade have been left without ob-gyns.

January 26th, 2007

For years now, proponents of medical malpractice “reform” have alleged that physicians, particularly ob-gyns, have been fleeing jurisdictions leaving more and more counties throughout the country without access to doctors.  In fact, in his 2006 State of the Union address, President Bush told the nation that there are “nearly 1,500 American counties without a single ob-gyn.”  This statement, however, is simply wrong.
In a recent study done by Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy organization, it was proven that fewer counties every year for more than a decade have been left without ob-gyns.  It is clear that the proponents of medical malpractice “reform” continue to spread myths to advance selfish interests in an effort to strip Americans of their civil rights. 

To learn more about Public Citizen’s study, click here.

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE NEW BOOK, AMERICA’S TUNNEL VISION–HOW INSURANCE COMPANIES’ PROPAGANDA IS CORRUPTING MEDICINE AND LAW, and to protect yourself from medical mistakes, CLICK HERE.